Friendly reminder that from a purely biological standpoint, genetic diversity is universally beneficial. Increased heterozygosity reduces the likelihood of recessive genetic disorders, enhances immune system robustness, and generally correlates with improved physical and cognitive outcomes in offspring. These are not fringe theories—they’re foundational principles in evolutionary biology.
Conversely, closed gene pools—like those found in isolated populations (like hillbilly communities) or, say, certain communities with a high prevalence of consanguineous marriage (like Pakistan) —tend to produce higher rates of congenital disorders, lower genetic fitness, and in extreme cases, the sort of degenerative traits we historically saw in dynasties like the Habsburgs. This isn't bullshit - it's actually measurable.
It’s always fascinating to me that those most fervently opposed to genetic outbreeding are often the same individuals who either consciously or subconsciously support in-group breeding to the point where one starts to wonder: is this about ‘heritage’, or "preserving the white race" or are you chuds just deeply, deeply attracted to your own sisters?
I don’t say that to be inflammatory—I genuinely think some of you haven’t unpacked that yet. Have you considered speaking with a therapist about it?
What exactly is wrong with racemixing?
