>These are the facts we know about the viral Dundee video:
>1. A guy of unknown age and affiliation was recording two girls, one of them 14.
>2. The guy already knew that she was carrying a knife before he started recording.
>3. The 14 year old girl brandishes a large knife and a hatchet.
>4. The 14 year old girl physically threatens the person recording the video.
>5. The other girl calls the 14 year old girl her sister, yet falsely claims that she is 12.
>6. The person recording has a foreign accent.
>This is all we know.
Could the guy recording this be a predator targetting little girls? Yes, it's possible.
>Is it likely? No, not really. The only "evidence" you have is that he's brown and sounds more mature and... that's it.
>The bottom line is, if I see two "little girls" (your words, by the way) brandishing or open-carrying very dangerous, REAL weapons on the street, I am calling the police. Recording the crime makes absolute sense.
>These girls are a danger to not just the person recording, but themselves, to each other, and to other girls their age.
>Any sensible person would call the police on a child carrying dangerous weapons. If you come to any other conclusion, it's because you've dehumanized other races so much that they can't be normal people and just want to rape and murder every single thing around you.
>If you want to have a discussion about "Should children be allowed to possess and carry deadly weapons in the UK?", you can have that, but you're not doing that.
>You're just masturbating over the fact that the guy recording is brown, therefore he is automatically in the wrong.
