>>508138577
It's possible some subset of glowies aren't allowed to post copyrighted images btw. Idk how real this is in practice but hilarious idea for a new litmus test for detecting glowniggers. They're pretty blatant anyways I guess. Still funny idea bullying some faggot spammer to post a single copyrighted images to prove they're a real anon and them being literally unable to. Kek.

>>508128611
Shills and discussion disruptors will burn in the fiery pits of hell for all eternity. Pedos too. You're powerless cowards. Wicked fools.