>>96188769
You should probably just not. But if you insist, you have to make interacting with them basically insufferable cringe or realistic towards the negative aspects of the animal. I have a farming background (my hometown is the horse capital of the world).

Ideally you don't get to have any positives about interacting with them whatsoever. There are ways to do this.

>Make them retarded, as in you have to do a retard voice for all of them level retarded, reference the fluffyponies for this. This will actually aid in realism as horses are not very bright and do a lot of stupid shit.
>Make them evil. They are not a noble race, they are voilent and stupid and corrupt and cowardly and dysfunctional. This is not by itself enough.
>Commission a non-furry, regular or horror-leaning artist to draw them. They should not be drawn with anything resembling idealized artistic conventions. Look up paintings of weird horses from before the invention of cameras.
>Make them untenable due to hygiene. Horses shit everywhere and are susceptible to all kinds of infections and infestations. Fucking bot flies lay eggs in their nostrils, it's gross.
>Make them unworthy of alliance. They're not going to be dexterous (hooves and whatnot) and they're not going to be durable (I shot a pony that went lame when I was like 17). They're also stubborn as shit (horses have to be broken in order to be ridden, it sucks) so a whole race of them with something resembling intellect (I still say make them retarded) is going to be completely up its own ass and self-serving like most herd animals actually are.

I doubt you're actually going to take my advice because you're a fucking horse girl or just a furry baiting for responses or something. But if you're actually serious look into how old school ttrpgs depicted beast races as malignant and unpossessed of the things that make humanity kinder and more compassionate. DO NOT under any circumstances depict them as noble or wise or some gay shit.