>>2051883
It's probably the depth of field or one of those camera terms but can I just say, women would look so much better if their asses weren't so grotesquely oversized. The rub here is that women's knees and thighs and calves and ankles are aesthetically superior due to the q angle, and yet the problem up above is the way the muscle and fat form around the iliac crest which is often far too flared. If science could make women where the femoral head were shaped for aesthetically optimized q angle but the ilium was properly restrained for a more reasonable waist to hip ratio I think we'd be on to something. Just need to have more innies on the labia majora and actually if we could just do away with the navel and seal that off for aerodynamics, that would be just great. Belly buttons are weird, who asked for that? In the ideal world there wouldn't actually be a vagina at all, just a nice smooth thigh gap, for it would smell much less offensive. Plus she probably can use a thinner chamois. While we're at it, no mouth, like in the matrix. Just pretty eyes and a cute nose and a perky ass. That's the ideal woman right there. Fertilization can be with a large hollow needle and then of course a C section, for you see I am not impractical, I just believe in aesthetics. She can poop and pee out of the same hole, that's why they used to call women birds. I am not a misogynist, if you're not convinced, I'd volunteer to have those modifications too. Aesthetics are the most important thing of all, even above practicality.