Search - 4rchive

>>64341469
Not about the relative failure rate as compared to PSA or Riley etc.

>>64341432
>>64341265
>>64341183
>>64341112
Honestly for a 103 looking gun if you're not going to have a kit built, I would go with a PSA unironically.
https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-ak-103-forged-classic-side-folder-polymer-rifle.html
While a warranty on a gun is about as useful as a warranty on a seat belt, at least your money is sort of protected. If you do have any issues with the KR-103 you're out of luck. Also as far as I'm aware, we don't really know the details behind the manufacturing processes that went into the KR-103, while with the PSA, we know now with their "better" guns that the bolt, trunnions, and carrier are true hammer forged parts, and you can get the CHF CL barrels.
https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-ak-103-forged-classic-side-folder-polymer-rifle.html

>>64342206
>do you have a report similar
We have BETTER than that report, which for all we know those pajeet poo saars that did the "analysis" don't know how to differentiate between machined from a forged bar stock vs. finish machined from a true hammer forged part. If all they're looking for is the presence of grain structure with no analysis of the geometry of said grain structure with respect to the external macro geometry of the part, then they wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a machined from forged bar stock, vs machined from true forging part.
In the case of WBP we have better than some pajeet poor engineering "firm" report, we have WBP themselves SAYING that all their shit is made from machined from billet bar stock. We have videographic and photographic proof of machined from billet bar stock front trunnions.