>>40896997
Fair enough. However, and correct me if I'm wrong, Jason for example claim that Ingo Swann's naked people on the moon that he remote viewed are slaves to the Nordic's, used as forced labour to fit his narrative of evil nazi archons. There's nothing in Ingo's account suggesting that they were slaves. He said he saw naked men working, some mining activity and that they noticed his presence and pointed at Ingo direction, which led to the end of the remote viewing session.
So, are they physical beings or spiritual/astral? How and why could they perceive Ingo viewing them if they're slaves? Small things like that irritate me because they build their case on it.
It could just as well be naked völkish Nazi hippies on the moon or a naked humanoid alien civilization.

>>40897149
I like DJ. He seems to be one of the least biased in this field. He examine things and is not really trying to fit it into a personal narrative.