>>719948161
Raytracing is too expensive to do in real time, so it uses averages over time to calculate light level. Instead of seeing a quick flash, you instead get a gradual increase and decrease. It's simply a limitation of current hardware, and a very good reason to not use it

>>715669696
>GOT A SCIENTIST HERE, HE'S GOT A LOT OF PICTURES OF GIRLS WITH *DICKS*!