>>283193131
>>283193260
Not everything is about fetishes, and even if you're right, the author did a horrible job of pandering.
>entire story beat of MC playing doctor was just a few dry paragraphs. >directly served to introduce his Frankenstein powers, a big part of the story from that point on
>little to no mention of anything sexual in the hundreds of chapters that follow.
>sluts are quickly sidelined
>none of the (many) other girls are sluts.

>>280559619
That's fair.
Personally I'd argue no, since any mentions of sex are so few and far between, and it's always very dry and curt. Van discovering his obstetrician powers is really just a set up for him creating frankenstein monsters later on.

>>279634368
It was never NTR or even NTR-coded.
Any mention of sex is extremely dry and clinical, as it only focused on the biological implications, which is directly related to his powers.