>>82258700
>All of them deserve to be relegated to the fringes of society because they're incapable of acting in a prosocial manner
hmmm... lets think this through for a minute...
>forced into existence with a set of genetics and a environment that largely shaped your personality and belief system
>try to find the truth and come to the conclusion that the most justified belief to hold is the blackpill philosophy, in good faith
>so because of their goodwill to find the truth and unfortunate circumstances of their genetics and upbringing, they deserve to suffer horrifically
doesnt this seem cruel to you?
if we change the circumstances, would it still hold?
would it be okay to abuse children who try to learn about the world because they are weak and ugly?
would it be okay to do so to animals?
how about other innocent people, like tribal people, or christians or any group, who you think have a world world view. would it be a good thing that they suffer?
it just cruel and a abuse of power?
to me, it seems like if someone is genetically weak, and tries to learn the truth, they did nothing wrong? it just seems cruel to suggest such a person deserves to suffer
4chan Search
2 results for "ecd45dadb34f6e4d72ecb0238fa035ac"
>>82253900
me too! i hate it! i wish to love no one
love and sex are genetic pathways that the strong use to exploit the weak from
lets look at children and mothers. mothers are genetically weak to the appearance and calls to children, and thus are, in a sense, controlled by them. their entire life is based around worshiping this child
same as stockholm syndrome. theres lots of historical cases of men who kidnaped, raped, tortured, abused and softly lovebombed women, and those women fell deeply in love with their kidnapper, and refused to escape
same thing for the modern man-female relationship. females are stronger because they're more sexier, better looking, and hold a monopoly of sexy pussy in a market of lots of desperate guys, and so men fall in love with them as a defense mechanism. if we all had tons of sexbots everywhere, men woudlnt fall in love with women so easily
same thing goes for men who make women cum really well, they are weak to that, and such men are powerful, and so they fall in love
its just about how much power you have over the weak, and how you choose to wield it
and to me, this seems kind of evil!
even with dogs, they were subjected to eugenics so we can breed the most loving loyal ones. they are just genetically weak. wolves arent like dogs at all.
its all just power
me too! i hate it! i wish to love no one
love and sex are genetic pathways that the strong use to exploit the weak from
lets look at children and mothers. mothers are genetically weak to the appearance and calls to children, and thus are, in a sense, controlled by them. their entire life is based around worshiping this child
same as stockholm syndrome. theres lots of historical cases of men who kidnaped, raped, tortured, abused and softly lovebombed women, and those women fell deeply in love with their kidnapper, and refused to escape
same thing for the modern man-female relationship. females are stronger because they're more sexier, better looking, and hold a monopoly of sexy pussy in a market of lots of desperate guys, and so men fall in love with them as a defense mechanism. if we all had tons of sexbots everywhere, men woudlnt fall in love with women so easily
same thing goes for men who make women cum really well, they are weak to that, and such men are powerful, and so they fall in love
its just about how much power you have over the weak, and how you choose to wield it
and to me, this seems kind of evil!
even with dogs, they were subjected to eugenics so we can breed the most loving loyal ones. they are just genetically weak. wolves arent like dogs at all.
its all just power