Take a look at this picture and really think about it. Do you honestly believe it would have received 300,000 likes if Twitter (or X, as it's now called) wasn’t heavily influenced by AI bots, like ChatGPT, for comments, likes, and virality? The likes or comments on this are like 95% bots

Worse things have gone viral by bots on X/Twitter, but I’m not against the meaning of the picture. I’m against the obvious manipulation of bots on Twitter and the way they shape the perception of real people.

Bots are marketing James Gunn’s DC movie and TV shows hard on X/Twitter/Reddit, trying to manipulate real people into adopting a manufactured narrative that was artificially created by bots.

This is especially evident considering Peacemaker had poor viewership and Superman flopped at the global box office.

In this case, it’s not about social engineering, like the anti-white male race-baiting or any predictable viral who bots promote on X/Twitter, supported by Twitter’s since 2017. It’s about bots being used to market James Gunn’s DC movies and TV shows and Rotten Tomatoes, James Gunn is having supporting of Bots of Twitter/X/Reddit, Rotten Tomatoes Ratings and all WB money but Superman flopped hard and Peacemaker have poor viewership numbers.

These shows flopped hard, but magically, James Gunn is getting 300k likes from bots for Superman or Peacemaker.

Do you really think this is organic and natural, rather than part of a marketing effort to manipulate real people on social media, who are interacting with these bots?

Look at ChatGPT, Twitter has had bots of this level of realism since at least 2017. It's not just about likes; bots are also used for comments, and they even have accounts.

This manipulation started long before Elon Musk took over, politics and elections are fake, it's a theater to make regular people don't feel impotent and think that they can choose something voting or support the new staged character who is promoted on social media or TV.