>>941400231
On that note; the human mind can describe things it doesn't know. Speech is one application where we use this ability with sufficient frequency to develop it. Unless you're very aware of the nature of the subconscious most of us do this so instinctively we don't even notice we're doing it. Those that become exceptional in using the power of words become capable of drawing not just ideas out of nothing, but bringing rise to physicality. Orators, singers, philosophers, when they are exercising their speech, can alter reality fundamentally.

Clearly art and other creative exercises beyond speech can also have these kind of effects; not just in culture but in how we perceive ourselves independent of time. But by far, speech is the most powerful. Hence why God uses words to create.

>>938974218
Nothing being posted here is intended to be art. It's a product designed for consumption. That product can be the result of aesthetics and logic. In the case of SD there is also a third participant being the diffusion and tokenization processes themselves.
I think you are caught up on defining aesthetics. Make the distinction; some aesthetics are objective but their totality in an object can be subjective. Architecture is a good example of this.

>>937074789
It's slop