>>106291259
>>106291304
To be fair, SATA expanders have never been any good. It's an afterthought in the SATA spec, only existing because chinkshit OEMs berated the SATA-IO to specify it, so they could sell their bottom-of-the-barrel budget servers and say "w-we support expanders just like real servers with SAS h-honest guize."

Hey fuck jannies, why did you delete >>105547730 (which is the full truth), but left >>105547610 (a crop created for lying) up?
Are you THAT used to getting away with bullshitting your userbase?