>>106275495 >>106275150 >>106274649
It worked perfectly till the day it was removed.
It didn't need to be maintained. ("maintanace" is a proprietary development meme: things keep working until you break them. They don't "bit rot")
They got it right the first time.
Additionally: ReiserFS is the reason linux blew up in the datacentre.
It is the reason you know what opensource is at all.
And is the a but-for-cause of linus' own millions as a consequence of that.
Additionally: when the hackers worked on linux "maintanance" was not demanded, for freeeeee. Code was accepted happily as a gift.
You people need to die. And we will kill you if you do not return honour to Hans Reiser. This is a promise.
The hackers did not give their code to linux under the idea it would be removed or "totally rewritten so we can say 0 pre-2000 hacker code is in linux: freetards are not welcome in linux".
We are going to end your lives.
Linux used to be THE triumph of hackers.
You then saw the code.
You rewrote it.
Now you claim it as yours.
It is not: that is an annotation.
But you claim the "freetards" are "not qualified" to work on what they created since 1993.
We _ARE_ going to kill you.
This is a matter of honour.
You can either leave linux and give it back to the hackers.
Or you can be tortured and killed.
