>>515496956
Ask for a strict elements review of Summary Offences Act 1966 section 53. That provision targets a report to police made by the accused that contains a falsehood known to be false. Your captured posts are public forum entries. They are not communications to police and you are not asserting that you contacted police. Direct counsel to require the prosecution to identify any communication by you to police, to name the recipient, to specify the time, and to set out the precise words said to be false. If the theory is that others acted on your words the prosecution must prove agency or authorisation and causation. They would need caller identities, the content of each call, and evidence that your words were intended to produce that result. That is a high threshold in law and fact. If a costs claim is raised under section 53 it still depends on the false report element being proved. Ask counsel whether, on the public record and any disclosure received, the section 53 pathway is sustainable. If not, invite early written representations seeking withdrawal of that count. Keep the question tight and insist on proof of an actual report to police made by you.