>>214076668
>a white nation
I disagree. It originated from the two Mexican Empires that followed the Viceroyalty of New Spain, where peninsulares (Spanish directly coming from Europe) and criollos (offspring of Spanish parents in New Spain) occupied the top of the social hierarchy, but the majority of the kingdom was indigenous and mestizo. It still continues to be to this day, although the mestizos are now a majority. I'm not saying this is good or bad, just stating what I think is a demographic fact. This country has both Spanish and indigenous roots, everyone here knows this and it's why it's more difficult for a Mexican to be racist than an American for example. The Spanish conquerors intermingled with natives, unlike the British settlers who either massacred them or pushed them away from their society.
This is not taking into account other immigrant movements like the Spanish who were given an opportunity to escape from the Civil War at the middle of the last century.
Given the leftist and anti-Spanish governments we've had at the national level since 2018, who push a rhetoric of the Spanish conquerors being evil exploitators and thieves who sacked natural resources and precious metals, instead of real history showing they formed a new civilization and country opening its arms to allied, indigenous societies who were permitted to integrate and benefit from things like hospitals, universities and charitable church works, and modern Mexican society's apparent, progressive fascination with the country's pagan past, it cannot be said it is a "white country" (not like I believe "white" is inherently good or something with a specific meaning, by the way).
