Bumping for trvthnuke, although I like to think that the earliest Christianity wasn't *quite* as overtly cucked as the Christianity that won out in the early heresy wars. Specifically I think the version of Paul's letters we have had some uncertain amount of text mixed into them to make them more cucked, like Romans 13:1-6 which is a level of bootlicking that seems difficult to believe even from Christians, since it says,

"For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended."

Meanwhile Jesus got crucified by the authorities supposedly despite being perfectly innocent, and Paul had been thrown in prison around seven times throughout his life before eventually being executed himself, presumably despite being at least relatively innocent in his own eyes and in the eyes of other Christians. So would Paul have really written that? Moreover verse 6 reads like an awkward artificial transition into the next verse about paying taxes, pretending like it's a justification for it, although to me verse 7 continues fairly naturally from the end of the last chapter and is complete in itself: taxes are paid because they are implicit in the broader command to give to everyone what you owe them, in line with Jesus' own justification in Mark 12:

"Bring me a denarius and let me see it." And they brought one. Then he said to them, “Whose head is this and whose title?” They answered, “Caesar’s.” Jesus said to them, "Give to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and to God the things that are God’s."