>>518906772
>Literally the image referenced says otherwise.
no it doesn't.
>You're wrong and that's a bit of a stretch. I understand having someone be skeptical is rare for you.
k
>You're the one not providing anything.
so believe the kikes I don't give a shit.
>Cool. You say that. You provide nothing else.
seethe more kike I don't care.
>Sometimes one asks questions to appear less informed to have the other spell it out. I do it to see if I'm wasting my time replying to a bot.
sounds like kike seething.
>Okay, so that "likely" is holding a lot of weight there
no it's not.
>I did think it was odd that Lewin was the only one who "fought back" and got stabbed. Why did no one else..?
it's a stupid made-up story you dumb kike.
>Also, why the fuck was he the only one named to do so. Who tf reported THAT from within the plane.
it's a made up story.
>I think it'd be cheaper and way easier to crash a plane into the ground than do that.
no one gives a shit what you think, also what's 'easier or cheaper' is absolutely meaningless
what's important is the psyop goes off without a hitch, a single gust of wind could have blown the plane off course such that it just winged teh building, then the collapse wouldn't be sellable.
these psyops reduce the moving parts to the fewest possible pieces, in order to ensure success, considering there were 20 years of war contracts afterwards, any expense would be easily repaid.
Not to mention the airline shorts, and the stolen gold.
> This is getting into "it would be easier to land on the moon than to fake landing on the moon" territory.
yeah keep believing the government vaxxie.
>Whether or not vibrational energy could cause spontaneous and catastrophic failure, I don't care.
it's a microwave weapon.
>I don't care. I think skyscrapers are retarded buildings that are more a marvel of engineering than intelligent domiciles or places to conduct business.
sounds like something a faggot would say.