>>11371749
I think there would be a recognition that a life of brutality and pain is just what slaves are meant for, but that while slave cruelty laws do exist, it's a line that only really carries social consequences, rarely legal ones.

At the end of the day they're just slaves. It's super weird to be into torturing them to within a inch of their life, much less actually killing them, but legal enforcement runs into the problem where most people agree there should be a line, they just don't agree as to where. The idea that these things even feel pain in a similar way to humans is not universally agreed upon.

>>11371764
I would say that it's often thought of as a nice idea, I'd appreciate the level of care they want to give to slaves, but it's very misguided. slaves are meant to be this way, deep inside their servile soul is the need to exist underneath people. Even if you were to give them all of these human comforts, the desire to be human comfort will come through, and you'll find them trying to take off their clothes and worship some pebble that someone they really like stepped on.

It's ultimately naive the idea that you can teach a slave to be anything else. You'll just be disappointing yourself and it.