>>17927255
>would be completely incoherent if they're all "fully God" and God has no parts:
nta but yes the trinity and incarnation are just incoherent, which is why the best defense you have is special pleading like pic rel
>>17927258
>no part of my hand is somebody else
Yep and no part of you is fully you either. Meaning the Father/Son/HS are not fully God, they are each just 1/3 God. You still haven't answered my question and I am not sure why.