>>16819649
>trans rights
No such thing. Everyone has the same rights in an ideal society. There are no separate "classes" of rights (especially not for mentally ill men wearing dresses)

The gay "rights" and trans "rights" and women's "rights" etc are all new rights they invent because they want new privileges. Such as...

Gays have the same rights as everyone else: marry someone of the opposite sex. They don't get to invent a new right to marry someone of the same sex etc.

Mentally ill troon men wearing dresses have the same rights as everyone else: use the bathroom that corresponds to your sex/gender (same thing) assigned at conception. They don't get to invent new rights to use whatever bathroom their perverted feelings desire.

"Women's rights" gets more complicated because 100 years ago they actually didn't have the same rights as men. But that no longer applies. Anyone screeching "womens rights" today is just trying to invent privileges for women, like having their accusations in a courtroom or an HR mediation have more weight than a man's etc.

>a social construct like race
Also wrong. We can easily classify races with DNA and even bone structure. If a construct correlates with observable scientific phenomena to the point it has strong predictive power then it is not a social construct by definition. To steer my wall of text back to the topic: Dawkins of course acknowledges race is real pic related. He's still a faggot though and pretends it doesn't matter.

>>513613733
No, retard. What she's saying is, all the atheists have done to Europe is make it too weak to resist being conquered. This is also what Dawkins says, and anyone else with a fucking brain.

https://x.com/MrWinMarshall/status/1774578989719343583