>>513078047
>It's only a problem becasue men will monogamously pair with them
Not a problem. Historically speaking women have always been the drivers of the breeding pool and men are disposable.
>and women can only really pair with one man to begin with
Completely false. Women can pair bond with leagues of men. Of course this cheapens her social value and destabilizes society, but the point remains that women do this sometimes.
This is why the Turks have bloodlines deep into the heart of Siberia or British blood is in Zimbabwe, South Africa and the US. Low value men venture out and find new puss. They impregnate them and produce offspring. Meanwhile back home women have to be less choosey and fight each other over the men left therefore increasing breeding at home and abroad. Hence the genome spreads further and wider.
>>513064283
Bringing me to the point. The flaw is that men must venture out and conquer these wildflowers. If a man takes a black woman because she's considered scraps off the table he's going to end up with a whore and raise a kid that's belongs to a past nigger bf.
White men must sail the oceans and go to South Africa if they wish to bleach. It will improve the conditions for the Afrikaaners by giving them more white brethren, and it will improve the conditions at home as the women left will realize they need to stop rejecting "incels" in order to not end up some lonely roastie.