>>513422332
>not all of the lakes
to
>well all lakes but
anyway i got my answer
you're both retarded and dishonest

>we were never just talking about one year. the satellite image I cited is from 2025, and there is an obvious difference between the two lakes that speaks for itself
you're incredibly stupid
the current level of either doesn't matter for your argument
the trend between years does
and no it doesn't have to be 2025, google maps use a bunch of stitched up footage spanning years
so unless you go to the desktop google earth or do some fuckery you can't tell that
>no u. a smart person would be able to come up with convincing arguments,
compared to you just about anyone is smart
>not just emotional outbursts and insults
yeah
thats why you slowly walked back your claims to finally this post of yours