>>718005086
>EA banned over 300 000 accounts. Why was Riley not banned?
What a curious question. The answer is that I do not know. The argument that because he was not banned he did not cheat is an inherently faulty one. Lance Armstrong was a prolific cheater for years. He was not caught until years later. Was he not cheating until he was caught and banned?
>The clip accumulated over 70 million views. Why did EA no act and ban? It would be in their best interest. The game is highly anticipated, people are sick of cheaters and people also hate the new invasive kernel access anticheat. This would be the perfect slam dunk. But no ban. Why is that?
If and when EA does ban him, would you consider that direct evidence of cheating then? I highly doubt it.
>Why does every pro player say it's legit? Meanwhile, literal who dad gamers on Twitter are the ones saying it's cheating.
Every player is not saying they are not cheating, some are. If every pro player told you your blood is actually orange juice would you believe it?
>Do you understand how aim bots work? You do realize that perform line of sight check, right? You do realize they avoid collisions, right? I would like to know why you think an aimbot written by someone knowledgeable enough to bypass EAJavelin and SecureBoot would omit to include this feature. This isn't some chink CS script.
I am playing a baseball game that has a cheat code which when entered lets me hit a home run. I enter that cheat and hit a home run 4 times in a row. Afterwards I do not enter the cheat and strike out. Did I not cheat because I struck out, or did I simply refrain from cheating at the latter time?
