Living in the 21st century, it's hard for me not to be a hitler admirer. I've learnt that leftism is the most evil ideology in human history, it's fundamentally anti-human. Even the most moderate liberals want you dead or suffering.
Reading the mein kampf and weimar history is eye opening because it shows you how much they have not changed in a century. Hitler absolutely wrecked these demons, and that makes him such a great role model
4chan Search
6 results for "f483d79e4c745544fcef2be860d43eae"
It's getting difficult for me to NOT like adolf hitler.
I used to be a liberal and then became an anti-sjw conservative who believed in values of peace, dialogue and respect for your opponents. But in the past decade, leftists have made it incredibly hard to maintain civility. In the past few years i've realized that the democrat party has built it's entire politics on hate for white people, christians, and men. Even the most moderate liberals want you dead or suffering if you aren't in their club. In other words leftism is an anti-human demonic ideology.
Reading the mein kampf and weimar history, i found out that it was the exact same a hundred years ago to. Nothing has changed. Hitler talks about leftoids repeatedly, calling out their evil ideology and successfully fought against it. Hitler feels like an ideal figure that i've always wanted to exist in this timeline.
This makes me greatly admire hitler. Sadly, i am aware he did commit a genocide and waged a pointless war, which makes me guilty for having positive feelings about hitler.
I used to be a liberal and then became an anti-sjw conservative who believed in values of peace, dialogue and respect for your opponents. But in the past decade, leftists have made it incredibly hard to maintain civility. In the past few years i've realized that the democrat party has built it's entire politics on hate for white people, christians, and men. Even the most moderate liberals want you dead or suffering if you aren't in their club. In other words leftism is an anti-human demonic ideology.
Reading the mein kampf and weimar history, i found out that it was the exact same a hundred years ago to. Nothing has changed. Hitler talks about leftoids repeatedly, calling out their evil ideology and successfully fought against it. Hitler feels like an ideal figure that i've always wanted to exist in this timeline.
This makes me greatly admire hitler. Sadly, i am aware he did commit a genocide and waged a pointless war, which makes me guilty for having positive feelings about hitler.
Hitler asks us --
>In this world is not the creative act of the genius always a protest against the inertia of the mass?
>What shall the statesman do if he does not succeed in coaxing the parliamentary multitude to give its consent to his policy? Shall he purchase that consent for some sort of consideration?
>Or, when confronted with the obstinate stupidity of his fellow citizens, should he then refrain from pushing forward the measures which he deems to be of vital necessity to the life of the nation? Should he retire or remain in power?
>In such circumstances does not a man of character find himself face to face with an insoluble contradiction between his own political insight on the one hand and, on the other, his moral integrity, or, better still, his sense of honesty?
>Where can we draw the line between public duty and personal honour?
>Must not every genuine leader renounce the idea of degrading himself to the level of a political jobber?
>And, on the other hand, does not every jobber feel the itch to 'play politics', seeing that the final responsibility will never rest with him personally but with an anonymous mass which can never be called to account for their deeds?
>Must not our parliamentary principle of government by numerical majority necessarily lead to the destruction of the principle of leadership?
>Or may it be presumed that for the future human civilization will be able to dispense with this as a condition of its existence?
>But may it not be that, to-day, more than ever before, the creative brain of the individual is indispensable?
>In this world is not the creative act of the genius always a protest against the inertia of the mass?
>What shall the statesman do if he does not succeed in coaxing the parliamentary multitude to give its consent to his policy? Shall he purchase that consent for some sort of consideration?
>Or, when confronted with the obstinate stupidity of his fellow citizens, should he then refrain from pushing forward the measures which he deems to be of vital necessity to the life of the nation? Should he retire or remain in power?
>In such circumstances does not a man of character find himself face to face with an insoluble contradiction between his own political insight on the one hand and, on the other, his moral integrity, or, better still, his sense of honesty?
>Where can we draw the line between public duty and personal honour?
>Must not every genuine leader renounce the idea of degrading himself to the level of a political jobber?
>And, on the other hand, does not every jobber feel the itch to 'play politics', seeing that the final responsibility will never rest with him personally but with an anonymous mass which can never be called to account for their deeds?
>Must not our parliamentary principle of government by numerical majority necessarily lead to the destruction of the principle of leadership?
>Or may it be presumed that for the future human civilization will be able to dispense with this as a condition of its existence?
>But may it not be that, to-day, more than ever before, the creative brain of the individual is indispensable?
Now that the dust is settled, was he right?
>The Esthonians are the élite of the Baltic peoples. Then come the Lithuanians, and lastly the Latvians. Stalin used Latvians for the executions which the Russians found disgusting. They're the same people who used to have the job of executioners in the old empire of the Tsars
>The Esthonians are the élite of the Baltic peoples. Then come the Lithuanians, and lastly the Latvians. Stalin used Latvians for the executions which the Russians found disgusting. They're the same people who used to have the job of executioners in the old empire of the Tsars
Can you rank the baltic countries?
>The Esthonians have a lot of Germanic blood.
>The Esthonians are the élite of the Baltic peoples. Then come the Lithuanians, and lastly the Latvians. Stalin used Latvians for the executions which the Russians found disgusting.
>They're the same people who used to have the job of executioners in the old empire of the Tsars.
>The Esthonians have a lot of Germanic blood.
>The Esthonians are the élite of the Baltic peoples. Then come the Lithuanians, and lastly the Latvians. Stalin used Latvians for the executions which the Russians found disgusting.
>They're the same people who used to have the job of executioners in the old empire of the Tsars.
Why was such an italoboo?
The Aryan peoples are peoples who are particularly active. The
Italian is as diligent as an ant (bienenfleissig). Meanwhile in the eyes of the
Russian, the principal support of civilisation is vodka. His ideal
consists in never doing anything but the indispensable. Our con
ception of work (work, and then more of it!) is one that he sub
mits to as if it were a real curse. the Italians have so many qualities that make us like them.
Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the State. The Roman Empire is a great political creation, the greatest of all.
The Italian people's musical sense, its liking for harmonious proportions, the beauty of its race! The Renaissance was the dawn of a new era, in which Aryan man found himself anew.
There's also our own past on Italian soil. A man who is in different to history is a man without hearing, without sight.
Such a man can live, of course—but what a life?
T
Italian is as diligent as an ant (bienenfleissig). Meanwhile in the eyes of the
Russian, the principal support of civilisation is vodka. His ideal
consists in never doing anything but the indispensable. Our con
ception of work (work, and then more of it!) is one that he sub
mits to as if it were a real curse. the Italians have so many qualities that make us like them.
Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the State. The Roman Empire is a great political creation, the greatest of all.
The Italian people's musical sense, its liking for harmonious proportions, the beauty of its race! The Renaissance was the dawn of a new era, in which Aryan man found himself anew.
There's also our own past on Italian soil. A man who is in different to history is a man without hearing, without sight.
Such a man can live, of course—but what a life?
T