>>106857285
>no linear types
>no capability types
>no exceptions (yes chud, exceptions can be implement as syntactic sugar for sum types error pattern matching)
>no defer block
>no error propagation
>you have to do the "borrow" and "ownership" by yourself (pic)
>simplistic simple pass compiler
>no templates
>no macros
>no move semantic
>no interfaces
>poor performance
>hurrr durrr NIH mindset bullshit to justify a poorly designed compiler
>70% of performance with 10% of the code of LLVM, sure dude
>no OOP (this is not good or bad)
>C based syntax
>no function overload
It can't make C obsolete. It's basically C but 50 years later.