>>16837360
Vaxxies prefer such "studies" like pic-rel. Retrospective design, prone to selection bias, confounding and inability to establish causality. It requires prospective RCTs for validation. Small vaccinated cohorts, only 180 (NSCLC) and 43 (melanoma) patients vs 704/167 unvaccinated, limits statistical power and generalizability. Confounding factors, unadjusted cocid mortality prevention may inflate survival benefits. The study uses arbitrary timing, 100-day vaccination window lacks mechanistic justification. Study is restricted to NSCLC/melanoma, preclinical mouse data not fully translatable to humans. Institutional database risks missing/incomplete records. Finally this trashy "study" has massive COI. It was funded by NIH/NCI grants, it git FDA award and massive government-associated foundation funding. It is a fake study, made for political order but vaxxies like such stuff because it calms them down. Authors additionally funded/granted by Rohe.
BTW, Gavi is an organisation owned by Bill Gates xD
4chan Search
2 results for "f5a1b634f23ec51ee011bdf5c16bee6b"
>>520652903
Vaxxies prefer such "studies" like pic-rel. Retrospective design, prone to selection bias, confounding and inability to establish causality. It requires prospective RCTs for validation. Small vaccinated cohorts, only 180 (NSCLC) and 43 (melanoma) patients vs 704/167 unvaccinated, limits statistical power and generalizability. Confounding factors, unadjusted cocid mortality prevention may inflate survival benefits. The study uses arbitrary timing, 100-day vaccination window lacks mechanistic justification. Study is restricted to NSCLC/melanoma, preclinical mouse data not fully translatable to humans. Institutional database risks missing/incomplete records. Finally this trashy "study" has massive COI. It was funded by NIH/NCI grants, it git FDA award and massive government-associated foundation funding. It is a fake study, made for political order but vaxxies like such stuff because it calms them down.
BTW, Gavi is an organisation owned by Bill Gates xD
Vaxxies prefer such "studies" like pic-rel. Retrospective design, prone to selection bias, confounding and inability to establish causality. It requires prospective RCTs for validation. Small vaccinated cohorts, only 180 (NSCLC) and 43 (melanoma) patients vs 704/167 unvaccinated, limits statistical power and generalizability. Confounding factors, unadjusted cocid mortality prevention may inflate survival benefits. The study uses arbitrary timing, 100-day vaccination window lacks mechanistic justification. Study is restricted to NSCLC/melanoma, preclinical mouse data not fully translatable to humans. Institutional database risks missing/incomplete records. Finally this trashy "study" has massive COI. It was funded by NIH/NCI grants, it git FDA award and massive government-associated foundation funding. It is a fake study, made for political order but vaxxies like such stuff because it calms them down.
BTW, Gavi is an organisation owned by Bill Gates xD