>>41044692
Ultimately, the real question to ask is:
>What is the purpose of seeking to remember or accumulate knowledge?
>Can the rediscovered knowledge truly be reintegrated into our present existence, or does it only add to the burden?
>What good is the truth if it only adds to the suffering?

For my part, I don't regret having revived certain memories linked to my past lives. I know that inevitably, these fragments would have returned to me one day, whether in this incarnation or another. But it must be recognized that it is not an easy path to bear. Generally, what the soul retains and resurfaces are the wounds, the trials, the deep scars: for these are the ones that most mark the soul and shape its path.

We could compare life to a video game: you have main missions to accomplish, those that define your current existence. But sometimes, these missions don't seem enough. So, you add side quests, which are like transgenerational missions. In this way, by embodying your own life, you also carry part of the memory and burdens of your ancestors.
This is a task with significant consequences, as it requires great spiritual endurance. It all depends on the state you are in in your current life:
>Are you ready to bear this additional weight, or is it already too much for what you are going through?

From a Gnostic perspective, these painful reminiscences are not simple memories: they are fragments of inner gnosis, keys left in the darkness so that the soul, as it stumbles, may find the light again. It is often in pain that the purest message is hidden, the one that reminds us of our origins and urges us to free ourselves from the cycle.