>>3840079
>Nevertheless, these small bits have better writing than anything in PoR, and the fact that you still insist that it had decent plot with "twists" is very funny, all of them were as obvious as if it's a children's book except for the human Tyranthraxus not being real one.
No, they don't have better writing. Quite frankly, you chose the best examples, all of which are not particularly deep or compelling. You only say it's "children's book tier" because you have no actual legitimate criticisms of them other than vague allusions to know what the fuck happens in it and how it develops in-game. I'm not stupid enough to proclaim it as some grand philosophical odyssey, but almost no games were back then, other than text adventures.

>You never played 6 it seems.
6's story is better than 5, but it's still not a compelling reason to play the game. Pool of Radiance had a compelling enough story that drove you to finish it.

>You have a vision disability or shit taste. Sole piece of Jun Suemi's art alone destroys every bit of PoR's visuals. And by the way, those were in 1990's PC-98 release as well.
That is not from the PC-98 version, you retard, lmao, congrats on outing yourself as not having played any of the fucking games. Those are from the Wizardry Llylgamyn Saga release in 1998, which had completely redone dungeon interiors. The dungeons in the PC-98 version were wireframe, dipshit. So again, overall, Pool of Radiance, YES, has better total graphics in comparison.

>Either complete retard or bait, no comments there. All PoR levels save for pyramid, Tyrnathraxus maze, and maybe graveyard were utter brainless garbage, even then they all combined held no candle to Manfretti's theatre.
Yea, no comments there because you know I'm right and the only criticism you have is generic, vague, faggot-retard nonsense that holds no merit or substance.

I think we can summarize the rest of you retarded post as "didn't play either game".