>>24816331
>Only if your periodization doesn't allow for anything in between classical and medieval
I don't, most people don't, and you failed to offer one. If you want to suggest that Aurelian and Constantine are not classical then you are going to have to put in some effort to do so.
>At some point later in the discussion I did ask
You failed to use decent language to explain what you mean, you can just move on from that. We don't have to keep reflecting on that. If you want to compare texts, just compare them by name instead of leaving it to others because obviously everyone else in this thread disagrees with you.
>It's spelled snootiness
Picrel