>>64159489
>Military formations can have their own limited logistical force such as fuel tankers, you don't need a delivery of gas straight from Moscow.
Except that is something the Soviets didn't do below divisional level, but you go ahead and believe what you want to believe.

> random post-nuke Germans would venture out to bomb bridges willy nilly
West Germany had a fuckhuge plan to rig every single bridge for destruction in case of war, with charges stored by local authorities ('Landkreis' in German) and all bridges plus some crossroaods having holes for those demo charges built in.
It is a defensive measure, buut if NATO decided to attack the WarPac you can reasonably assume that among the preparations wouldl be the rigging of infrastructure in case of counterattack.
And no, it wouldn't destroy all brdiges. But theh plan had highway maintenance people standing by to blow up brdiges.

>Best counter-argument to NBC equipment of soviet troops is 'well you can't move fast in that :^)'
Well that is what NBC protected troops do. They slow down. To a fucking crawl.
And yes, if you don't have a suit you can end up very much combat ineffective from touching some VX-contaminated foliage days after the area got contaminated.

>Soviets will just get stuck because uhm... They will!
Observing Soviet and post-Soviet/Russian troops in action leads to this exact conclusion. They are alll show, all bite, with zero ability to sustain.