>>215580526
Roid rage
4chan Search
2 results for "f6e4580801ceb28f66a993e386a906a9"
the female is designed to be fuckable. the male is designed to be a power fantasy for the player. male aesthetics are based around power and intimidation - not the fact of them, but the potential of them. these are more abstract, and so can be represented in many ways. whereas fuckability has a particular shape to it.
>"but"
yes, yes. we all know you're a freak. and i actually agree - i wish that society included more diverse female bodies. male sexual desire is actually less conforming than female desire - women tend to all like the same thing, whereas male preferences are less clustered. but them's the breaks. so long as female characters are being designed for fuckability first and personality second, we will just keep seeing the same kind of female.
the problem is that the only people pushing back against this are (and it pains me to use this word unironically) """"woke"""", which means their character designs are trash. a female character can be characterful without being fuckable, but """"woke"""" designs just end up being bland. for example pic related is a good female character design. it's deliberately unfuckable, but it plays into tropes and style. it's playful. you know what to expect. it's fun. it's a fun archetype and a fun design. (and to some people it IS fuckable). you could have a fortnite she-wolf version of this archetype and it would also be fun. but """"woke"""" design would refuse to lean fully into the archetype, insisting that we cleave the knowing unfuckableness of this character design from the archetype when that's half the whole point! women ARE judged based on their appearance, and to be an ugly woman MATTERS. it affects you. it affects character. you can't just ignore that. it robs the archetype of an essential element. """"woke"""" design doesn't challenge prejudice, it ignores it.
the point is that female character design is bad because it's bad, not because it's not sexy.
>"but"
yes, yes. we all know you're a freak. and i actually agree - i wish that society included more diverse female bodies. male sexual desire is actually less conforming than female desire - women tend to all like the same thing, whereas male preferences are less clustered. but them's the breaks. so long as female characters are being designed for fuckability first and personality second, we will just keep seeing the same kind of female.
the problem is that the only people pushing back against this are (and it pains me to use this word unironically) """"woke"""", which means their character designs are trash. a female character can be characterful without being fuckable, but """"woke"""" designs just end up being bland. for example pic related is a good female character design. it's deliberately unfuckable, but it plays into tropes and style. it's playful. you know what to expect. it's fun. it's a fun archetype and a fun design. (and to some people it IS fuckable). you could have a fortnite she-wolf version of this archetype and it would also be fun. but """"woke"""" design would refuse to lean fully into the archetype, insisting that we cleave the knowing unfuckableness of this character design from the archetype when that's half the whole point! women ARE judged based on their appearance, and to be an ugly woman MATTERS. it affects you. it affects character. you can't just ignore that. it robs the archetype of an essential element. """"woke"""" design doesn't challenge prejudice, it ignores it.
the point is that female character design is bad because it's bad, not because it's not sexy.