>>723640851
i will agree with that. it's also worth noting that the 'upper tiers' of AI stuff is edited extensively (https://files.catbox.moe/1a30ci.webm). it's undeniable that AI in general is just a tool, and nothing can genuinely replace the effort put in by a human. the hastily prompted stuff im just throwing into an iris thread is hardly worthy of any major praise, but its a lot better than what we had just 4 years ago.

>>723641152
gigabased