>>106342064
Unfortunately this would get epsteined in 3 days. However I did include the parameters used so reproducing them shouldn't be a problem.

>>106342545
Understandable cautionary aversion. Back in 2020 it was assumed that AV1 wouldn't be adopted until 2030 because GPU decoding was thought to be a hard requirement for decoding it.

However Dav1d, a CPU AV1 video decoder has added a mind boggling amount of backward compatibility going all the way back to a 2011 2500K if not further than that. Really really low end CPUs will still struggle like atom CPUs found in $80,000 teslas for some retarded reason but the majority of CPUs from more than a decade ago now have no problem decoding AV1 video. Also CPU encoding AV1 video through libsvtav1 is now faster and achieves significantly smaller file size at high quality than CPU encoding H264 video through x264 as proven by this thread SO THERE'S THAT TOO...

I honestly don't see why encoding groups haven't adopted AV1 yet. Maybe they're not as smart as they claim to be when it comes to video encoding stuff.