>>515805289
oh okay, it makes more sense to you that lightning struck a puddle hundreds of millions of years ago, leading to the first bacteria, which chaotically evolved into all living things including humans? and this is based on what exactly? it makes sense to you that water based animals randomly developed features that don't benefit them in their water-based environment, and eventually they transitioned to land-based animals?

have you read what the "FATHER" of evolution even taught? clearly not. darwin himself acknowledged the crucial importance of finding evidence of transitional forms in nature commonl referred to as the fossil record. he conceded without such evidence that his theory would be deemed inadequate. despite ongoing research there remains a significant deficiency in the fossil records that constnatly posed a critical obstacle to supporting it since its inception. when purported missing links are discovered they have been marred by numerous instances of fraud and forgery

"carbon dating makes sense" hahaha its a 5900 year process they've only been doing for 70 years, what part about it makes sense? they have barely gotten to 1% of the halflife of one molecule of carbon. not to mention, you would NEED to know the base level of carbon the life form had in order to measure its decay accurately, even in the same species animals would have different levels of carbon based on their size/weight. its impossible to look at a fossil and look at its current carbon and make an estimate of its age. again, its a pseudoscience that has never been proven to actually work. they simply hide this from you and teach it to you anyway, and you believe it because you're a simpleton who accepts anything you're taught in school as long as its from a source of authority like a "scientist"