>>150817954
>I've yet to see someone come up for an argument for why it's wrong for a creator to request this if you don't even have to listen to them.
That's where the discussion begins and ends, anon. The people who would listen to the creator in the first place would already be too busy thinking of the creator's feelings to willfully do something to make them upset. And the people who wouldn't listen sure as shit wouldn't pay any mind to this comic. It's basically just whining.

Though I just personally disagree that an artist gets to dictate what other people decide to draw on their own time and their own terms, just because they made the original. If they don't want to see it themselves, fine. If they don't want it shoved in their face by fans, that's fine too. But to dictate what fans can and can't create is the equivalent of an adult seeing a kid play with a teddy bear the used to own and then asserting "This is my toy you're borrowing, and you don't get to play with it unless you do it the way I want you to". Like, writers can do or request whatever they want, it just makes you look insecure and petty since you're basically policing people on how to treat an idea.

That and it never fucking works when you try it anyways. Remember the guy who made the "Feels Good" frog tried to write a comic depicting his funeral to protest the frog's usage outside of his comic, which caused every single rare pepe in the wild to suddenly delete itself out of existence? Of course you don't, because when he did that the internet just kept on making more of them in response. That's the point. Once you've unleashed it onto the internet, you the creator have as much control over an idea or a meme as you do over the entirety of the human unconsciousness. The only things you can do at that point are are fruitlessly fight against it or just acknowledge the reality of it.