>>11406975
They will cover INDIVIDUAL Catholic priests, but it's never framed as a CATHOLIC PROBLEM. Media organizations are very skittish about saying a religion is dirty groomer cult.
But we're talking about it now. The Catholics, the grooming gangs, the fact that Mossad was deeply involved in Epstein's Island, it's all out there. It's not like any of this info is being successfully suppressed by a shadowy organization (Mossad is actually pretty shit at it), it's that religions have a lot of money and will sue lamestream media if they say something they don't like. There is plenty of news, why would a news company pick a fight with any of these groups? That would hurt their bottom line.

You can interact with the complexity of the world, or you can cover your ears and scream DA JOOZ AND THE MUZZIES ARE ALL CONSPIRING AGAINST ME AND THAT IS WHY MY LIFE IS SHIT.

Only one outlook will make your life better.