>>214322537
And gasoline is 8100 kcal per 100ml, surely it'd make amazing survival rations where delivering energy is the most important thing, not providing macronutrients. This is how you sound counting substances indigestible by humans for the caloric intake.
Do you know how the caloric value is measured for foods? By burning. Literally the same process used for measuring energy density of coal. Alcohol has to be filtered by the kidneys, which takes energy, it is not digested in the intestine which would supply energy.

>>214323314
You're falling into the same trap, counting ethanol as calories.
If we go by the true caloric values of sugar content in wine, as per attached image, it's a completely different story. Yes, sweet wine has a lot of calories, no one is denying that, but who the hell drinks sweet wine? Not even semi-sweet, straight up sweet.