>>725007563
but again, let's go back a minute, why does this conversation need to happen at all if she's being honest? the entry level is literally "play a video game", and she can't do that.

and her videos are whining and seething over cartoon women existing and not being strong feminist types who don't need no men.

her videos have no value, she makes no good points, her footage isn't hers,

>>725007669
>Please. using b-roll footage is not the same as Hasan playing some fuckers entire youtube video while he goes to take a shit.
she still did it. and hasan has a bigger claim to fair use than she does because he's at least on screen, she wasn't. she just replaced other people's voices.

you going to bat for her would make sense if any of it was worth anything but its' not.

>Mostly because it's not necessary? This was never a project about her playing video games.
playing a video game is a requirement to commenting on video games, yes. end of story. thank you for playing.