>>514901264
>What are some activities almost exclusively enjoyed by whites?
Thinking.

>>23251508
>What are some activities almost exclusively enjoyed by whites?
Thinking.

>>514806389
>WHY IS IT NECESSARY TO A HAVE AN INFINITELY EXPANDING POPULATION?
It's not.
There are 7 billion people on this planet but 4 billion are worthless niggers and jeets who could easily be exterminated by judicious use of food resources and fresh water and the remaining 3 billion useful humans left could easily have exceptionally good lifestyles on the remaining resources.
>
Killing every nigger in Africa and every jeet in India/paki/etc could EASILY tip the balance and give the world back some stability.
>
Billions would perish but real humans would live on so it's a sacrifice I'm quite prepared to accept.
>
We wouldn't need to kill them directly; simply stop them moviing and reduce the food and fresh water they have available and they'll fight each other to destruction then we can ebola the remainder then exterminate what's left quite easily using autonomous hunter-killer machines.
No humans need die... only niggers and similar valueless brown things.
>
BONUS FEATURE;
>get american negros to return to Africa before the famines/droughts/wars so they're extincted too
>isreal will be easily exterminated as it is only 30ft across and surrounded by 1 billion angry beheaders who only need their leashes slackening for them to erase meddlesome juden
>the browns will then perish in the famines/droughts/wars as defined
>
What a wonderful world we could have.

>>514130195
>Explain to me why you think Democracy is wrong, I will argue why I think it is good
Democracy has been shit from the start.
Politicians were always needed as proxies for voters. THAT is the fatal flaw in democracy.
>
Politicians are incapable of representing anyone other than themselves. No human brain can represent anyone else's views except those of the politician so the idea of 'the will of the people' is a myth.
>
So replace politicians and their flaws with something better.
>
A MACHINE, AN ALGORITHM, A MATHEMATICAL MODEL, HOWEVER, COULD REPRESENT 'THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE' AS A GESTALT OF THE ENTIRE ELECTORATE AND ALL THEIR VIEWS AND VOTING TENDENCIES.
>
Instead of having any politicians as a proxy, have a better machine as the holder of all the voter's proxy votes.
>
We COULD exterminate all politicans and politics and all parties and replace them with a mathematical model that COULD represent the voting potential, the proxy, of each and every single voter and every vote would count toward the whole.
>
Democracy could be fixed... by eliminating politics, politicans and parties from democracy forever and replacing them with a server and a mathematical model that can vote like every voter, voting as they would io if asked about every political decision that needs to be made, how they would vote. It could be asked questions, just as we ask any AI, and reply accurately representing the majority of all those views.
It'd be cheaper and better than any political system that's ever existed AND able to make millions of decisions per second using 'THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE' as a data-set.
This data set is based on asking each voter in the electorate a series of questions and making the data-set publicly available, as it contains no identifiable voter data when amalgamated.
Made publicly available, like a data-set for an AI, means ANYONE with access to a CPU or GPU could verify what anyone says it replied.
Corruption is therefore impossible.