>>513944262
i am not disenfrachised in anyway
now what?
why is it always assumed that people that expose market rigging are poor?
is it b/c most 'successfu'l people today are on the take and really are incompetent frauds? probably

Money is often falsely equated with productivity, intelligence, class, success, integrity, and/or good taste.
If you equate success with money, you will likely be perpetually dissatisfied, in a constant state of longing.

But if you VALUE THINGS WHICH CANNOT BE BOUGHT, such as:
community
family
work ethic
intellect
fitness
perseverance
cleanliness
honesty
integrity
compassion
tradition
loyalty
reliability
patience
humor
If you value the above, you will always be content and successful, no matter where you are or what you do.
Judge yourself by deed, not possession.

Don't worry OP i'm not gonna flood your good thread
just a couple more

>>507859484
>rich elite to profit off of slave labor while providing no additional value to the system,

>elite
stop using this word
elite (n) - the best of a category, the finest, etc. (i.e. this could also apply to turnips)
elitist (n) - one who thinks they are better than others
There is a difference between the two.
Calling the worst of what humanity has to offer the "elite" is wholly untrue.
Elitist, yes. Elite, no.