>>724174651
I gotta agree with this. I have tried 120hz, 144hz, and 240hz.
The difference between 120hz and 60hz isn't as vast as 60hz and 30hz but it was enough that I instantly notice it. When my monitors drivers reset and go back down to 60hz I I instantly notice. I can't tell the difference between 144hz and 120hz, with 240hz and 120hz there is a difference but it's so small I have to sit and replay animations while actively looking for a difference to see it.

The pixel response time of 60hz is 33.3ms
The pixel response time of 60hz is 16.67ms
The pixel response time of 120hz is 8.33 ms
The pixel response time of 144hz is 6.94 ms
The pixel response time of 240hz is 4.16 ms

Even though the 240hz is twice as fast as 120hz the difference between the two is only half as much as between 120 and 60. 60hz to 120hz is absolutely worth it but once the higher you go the more the returns diminish. Unless you have performance to spare going higher than 120hz isn't worth it, especially given that frame rate drops are gonna be MUCH more noticeable.