>>516593611
Saying that he implied something misleading is substantially different from saying he knowingly said a lie on-air. When I heard the news I looked it up expecting to see that Kimmel said something about Kirk having it coming or calling his views disgusting or something like that, but it's literally none of that. It's the most milquetoast take possible. And again,
>He also said it before the texts were publicly released, so there wasn't really much clear evidence besides word of mouth what the shooter's political affiliations were at the time.

Of course none of this matters since Trump came out and just said outright that he doesn't think a show should have a license if their coverage of him is completely negative, not even mentioning Kirk. He flagged Kimmel to be taken down months ago in a Truth Social post in July, the wool is being over your eyes as you race to suck off the president of a country that isn't even your own.