>>282208102
>Finer line art and less compression look somehow worse than improper resolution unfit for my screen
Cool. It does not look artificial. The only thing I'm still trying to work out is the noise in the blacks and darker colors. But that may be due to the codec.

>>282207343
I appreciate the smaller file size. Otherwise yeah, the trade off is a lesser quality image.

>>282208145
Post your own screenshot then. Show me what a good image is supposed to look like with your setup.

The best part? This isn't even what it really looks like. I have a QLED display with HDR on top of it. So that noise I was talking about is not there while viewing, just in screenshots. And the colors are even more vibrant.