>>40913765
>so basically if you used your free will to deny christianity, other HUMANS would use their free will to torture you? are you really so dumb you can't hear yourself?
And how many people chose to get tortured? Not a lot I imagine. Hence your free will argument has failed.


>>40913793
>biblical god not all powerful
then you can discard the rest of the narrative

>they don't have to actually kill the animals
they still consume something. also they are an exception not the rule.

>in that case suffering would be the only state of existence
incorrect premise. they need other emotions to exist to make suffering more powerful. someone going bankrupt will be in more agony than everyone being homeless by default.

yes false hope is a powerful tool for the loosh farm. it's scientifically provable