Why do the Labour government want Wikipedia to be inaccessible to us?

>>213105246
Most concerning thing is how they're targetting Wikipedia of all sites.

Wikipedia, widely regarded as a "progressive/neoliberal-biased" site, is still not enough for them and they want it either strictly controlled, or gone from the UK internet.

Deeply worrying. These ghouls want a level of control over discourse that even the most hardline Chinese Communist Party members would consider too extreme.

>>213103122
>Wikipedia could be forced to limit access in the UK unless crucial elements of Britain’s online safety rules are changed, the High Court has been told.

>Lawyers for the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organisation which helps run the online encyclopaedia, warned it could be required to introduce a “quota-based” system for UK visitors if it is classified as a “category one” service under the Online Safety Act.

>Services falling under this designation are subject to the strictest duties under the digital laws, which are intended to stop children accessing harmful online material and prevent the spread of illegal posts.

>To stay outside the scope of the regulation, Wikipedia could cap visitor numbers from the UK so it does not qualify as a “category one” site, which are defined as those with seven million users.

>This would make it harder for British users to access the site when they wanted.

>The foundation has launched a legal challenge against Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, over the rules, warning they threaten to hit Wikipedia with strict regulations intended for social media giants such as Facebook and TikTok.

https://archive.is/WoMyQ