>>8171
>I'm not sure why are you
Pic related.

In this case, I don't at all buy into the argument that people wanting something should have it given to them for no reason, particularly because I'm not in charge of board creation and I don't get to say that everyone gets a board. A good example of this is how 4 video game boards were made seemingly out of nowhere, albeit with good intentions, despite there arguably being more popular topics that could be addressed with a new board. Another would be the Alternative Sports split, that albeit made with good intentions, left everyone else not affected by it wanting to be a fly on the wall at the modchat so they can more accurately call mean names to Mods who didn't give them board X on IRC and (Rest in Piss) /qa/. From my understanding we're not even enduring any sort of financial strife or hardware limitations, so we could give boards out like candy. But the most shrewd of policy makers would remark that doing so will only fan the flames for uncomfortable topics the moderation team wouldn't want to be discussed on the website: namely e-celebs and, may Allah forgive me for uttering this word multiple times, Inshallah, k*rean culture, k*rean manga, k*rean webtoons and the worst of them all; k*rean soap operas (that's right, the Mods actively prevent >(YOU), the people, from getting a K*reaboo gf.)

I'm merely adding to the thread by giving my thoughts on the issue.
So should there be a religious board? Given the content that's been proposed I don't think so, BAWW/blogposting is universally condemned on 4chan, not even /adv/ allows it, it's not constructive, and I find sadistic pleasure in BRing blogposters. 'Ate blogposters (not racist just don't like 'em.)
So if not BAWW then what's left as content? Feel free to add to that but I don't believe it'll solve the off-topic post problem nor provide a space for [thing?] that can't be discussed that's worth discussing and couldn't have a general on /bant/ (it can).