What are effective arguments in challenging the 'Hitler was the embodiment of all evil' straw man/ad hominem argument in academia? First, you need to discuss Holohoax and Weimar, but what other arguments would you suggest to provide, /pol/ (other than he loved doggos and animal life).

Yes, he made bad tactical decisions during wartime and a lot of Whites and Europeans were killed. But was that all really his doing? After all, who funded Hitler (American capitalists, right?)

And what about 'paragons of virtue', like Martin Luther King, Jr., or Mother Theresa. I understand Christopher Hitchens talked shit about Theresa and MLK watched a woman get raped, no? Plus MLK was a tool for the Jews to bring forth Tikkun Olam in the U.S. and West