>>106200254
There is literally nothing wrong with Gradle. Coming from CMake Gradle is a godsend. Sadly Gradle for C++ doesn't support modules, but perhaps in due time it will. Also heard good things about XMake but it breaks a lot in my experience.

>>106200494
I want a batteries included language and more ergonomic syntax.
C++ still has no std::net or std::process library and that's ridiculous.