>>17928944
You don't understand what I am saying, using a variant form of logic is the same as using paraconsistent logical systems to get out of contradictions.
>We can say it depending on what we are referring to.
I never said you cannot say it, I said there is no reason to describe that relation and this is exactly why classical logic is sufficient.
>They have different hypostatic properties that don’t compromise on the divinity
Except they do, the Father has greater (pic) and different knowledge like the argument from indexicals points out for example
>Yes, the being of God must be independent.
The Father is the only person of the trinity that satisfies this requirement.
>Which is why relations must exist within God
Absolutely not, God can love his creation before it was created. He knew since eternity past of every single one of us. And speaking of creation, God was the creator before there was any creation so similarly he could love before there was anyone to love. You are saying he is dependent